PM Methods

Agi­le, Tra­di­tio­nal or Hybrid – the Right Method for Every Project

Which pro­ject manage­ment methods are right for you?

Whe­ther tra­di­tio­nal, agi­le or hybrid — the choice of the right pro­ject manage­ment method depends on the requi­re­ments of your pro­ject. Tra­di­tio­nal approa­ches are sui­ta­ble for pro­jects with fixed objec­ti­ves and plans, while agi­le methods offer fle­xi­bi­li­ty for dyna­mic pro­jects. Hybrid approa­ches com­bi­ne the advan­ta­ges of both worlds, ide­al for pro­jects in which you want to com­bi­ne tra­di­tio­nal water­fall plan­ning with agi­le methods, for exam­p­le to allow agi­le pro­ject teams to work through indi­vi­du­al pro­ject pha­ses more flexibly.
With PLANTA Pro­ject, you can use all three methods seam­less­ly and adapt them fle­xi­bly — allo­wing you to per­fect­ly mana­ge every project.

Agi­le PM Methods

Fle­xi­ble and iterative

Tra­di­tio­nal PM Methods

Struc­tu­red and clear

Hybrid PM Methods

Fle­xi­ble and precise

Alle Funktionen der PLANTA-Editionen
Aspect Agile Project Management Traditional Project Management Hybrid Project Management
Approach Iterative and flexible, continuous adjustments Linear and plan-oriented, follows a fixed plan Combination of iterative and linear approach
Project structure Divided into sprints, focused on incremental results Project phases (e.g. initiation, planning, execution, completion) Customizable mix of agile and traditional elements
Planning effort Minimal at the beginning, detailed per sprint Comprehensive and detailed at the beginning Detailed planning for the overall project, flexible adjustments in sub-projects
Flexibility Very high, requirements can be adjusted at any time Low, changes often require rework and approvals Adaptations possible in agile areas, stability in traditional parts
Documentation Minimal and limited to the essentials Comprehensive, complete documentation Combination of minimal and comprehensive documentation
Risk management Risks are identified and dealt with during the sprints Risks are identified and managed in the planning phase Flexible risk approach depending on the project phase
Areas of application Suitable for projects with unclear or changing requirements Suitable for projects with clearly defined requirements Suitable for complex projects with mixed requirements
Team collaboration Close collaboration, strong focus on interaction Division of labor, often less interaction Combination of interaction and division of labor

You can find a more detailed definition in our blog article on agile or hybrid project management.

Agile Project Management with PLANTA Project*

Quick Access

Get right star­ted: open the board, crea­te tasks

Fast and intui­ti­ve ope­ra­ti­on with Kan­ban boards and addi­tio­nal views

Mini­mal trai­ning effort thanks to a user-fri­end­ly interface

Simp­le adjus­t­ment to indi­vi­du­al pro­ject requirements

Schneller Einstieg: Kanban-Board

Col­la­bo­ra­ti­on

Modern coope­ra­ti­on: Digi­tal­ly inter­connnec­ted, effi­ci­ent­ly orga­ni­zed and suc­cessful together.

Cen­tral plat­form for team col­la­bo­ra­ti­on and communication

Real-time updates and syn­chro­niza­ti­on for trans­pa­rent pro­gress tracking

Seam­less inte­gra­ti­on of tools and docu­ments for effi­ci­ent workflows
Collaboration

Tra­di­tio­nal Pro­ject Manage­ment with PLANTA Project

Detail­ed Pro­ject Plan­ning and Management

Never search for pro­ject infor­ma­ti­on again — find all pro­ject data whe­re you need it

Cen­tral pro­ject over­view for a clear structure

Trans­pa­rent plan­ning of mile­sto­nes and depen­den­ci­es for opti­mal pro­ject progression

Defi­ned pro­ject pro­cess with appr­ovals and workflow
Terminplan mit Prozessmodell

Resour­ce and Capa­ci­ty Management

Not all team mem­bers are equal­ly busy and the­re is a lack of resour­ces? Tho­se days are over:

Cen­tral uti­liza­ti­on over­view for trans­pa­rent plan­ning and management

Effi­ci­ent allo­ca­ti­on of resour­ces to opti­mi­ze uti­liza­ti­on across all projects

Ear­ly iden­ti­fi­ca­ti­on of bot­t­len­ecks for proac­ti­ve solu­ti­on finding

Auslastung der Teams

Hybrid Pro­ject Manage­ment with PLANTA Project

Com­bi­ning the Advan­ta­ges of Tra­di­tio­nal and Agi­le PM

Why choo­se one method when you can have the advan­ta­ges of both?

Com­bi­na­ti­on of clear plan­ning and fle­xi­ble adapt­a­ti­on for opti­mal pro­ject execution

Abili­ty to react quick­ly to chan­ges while main­tai­ning long-term goals

Pro­mo­ting team col­la­bo­ra­ti­on through agi­le approa­ches and clear respon­si­bi­li­ties from the clas­sic approach
Multiprojekt-Übersicht mit Auslastungsdiagramm

Fle­xi­ble Report­ing and Dashboarding

No sur­pri­ses in the pro­ject — track your pro­ject sta­tus live and inter­ve­ne quickly

Over­view of cur­rent pro­ject pro­gress through sta­tus reports and trend analyses

Info­board with sum­ma­ri­zed pro­ject infor­ma­ti­on on cos­ts, expen­ses, risks and devia­ti­ons from the ori­gi­nal plan

Pro­ject manager’s assess­ment of the future cour­se of the project

Dashboard-Ansicht im Web-Client
quote

Thanks to PLANTA, our pro­ject land­scape is now more acces­si­ble than ever.

pichler ketek referenzkunde

Wolf-Georg Pich­ler,
KETEK GmbH

quote

On-time deli­very has impro­ved signi­fi­cant­ly and mea­sur­a­b­ly thanks to the intro­duc­tion of new pro­ces­ses and the new mul­ti-pro­ject manage­ment system.

Den­nis Tomath,
Thys­sen­krupp AG

quote

All employees can pro­cess their tasks in the boards and bene­fit from sub­stan­ti­al­ly impro­ved com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on and collaboration.

losan kerstin moerel hybrides projektmanagement

Kers­tin Moerel,
Losan Phar­ma GmbH

*The for­mer PLANTA pul­se com­po­nent, PLANTA’s solu­ti­on for agi­le pro­ject manage­ment, is inte­gra­ted in the PLANTA Pro­ject Edition